|Induction Chemotherapy In Barrett Cancer - Influence On Surgical Risk, Outcome and Survival|
|Joerg R Siewert1, Florian Lordick*1, Katja Ott*1, Hubert J Stein2, Wolfgang A Weber*3, Karen Becker1, Christian Peschel*1, Ulrich Fink*1, Markus Schwaiger*1 |
1Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany2Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria3University of California, Los Angeles, CA
|OBJECTIVE(S): Induction chemotherapy (ICTX) is evidence based nowadays. In a prospective trial we analyzed the surgical risk, outcome, and survival in patients with Barrett cancer.|
METHODS: Patients had locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG I/II) classified T3 N0/+ M0 by endoscopic ultrasound, CT and 18FDG-PET. Patients with early metabolic response to ICTx assessed by FDG-PET continued on CTx for 12 weeks before surgery. Non-responding patients stopped CTx after 2 weeks and proceeded to surgery.
RESULTS: Between 05/2002 and 08/2005 111 patients were enrolled. The response rate to ICTx was 49%. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between responders and non-responders. 104 patients underwent resection (subtotal esophagectomy 70%, extended gastrectomy 30%). Postoperative complications occurred in 34% and the hospital mortality rate was 1.8% with no statistical difference between ICTX-responders and non-responders. There were more R0 resections (96% vs. 74%; p=0.002) in responders vs. non-responders. Lymph node involvement was seen in 20% vs. 62% (p<0.001). Both median relapse-free survival (29.7 vs. 14.1 months; p<0.002) and overall survival (median not reached vs. 25.8 months; p<0.015) were in favor of responders. Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy led to a reduction in both local and systemic recurrences.
CONCLUSIONS: ICTX can differentiate between biologically less and more favorable tumors and can improve the prognosis for so-called responders. The surgical risk is not negatively influenced by ICTX. The more radical resectability and the favorable lymph node staging seen in responders most likely explain the better survival.
Back to Scientific Program